| Feature | CVS | RVS | UAS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax Basis | Market value of the property | Potential rental income | Area of the property (per unit rate) |
| Flexibility | Highly flexible, responds to market fluctuations | Moderate, adjusts with the rental market | Fixed rates, lacks responsiveness |
| Applicability | LHigh-value urban areas, fluctuating markets | Established rental markets | Stable or slow-growth markets |
| Administrative Ease | Complex requires frequent updates | Moderate, relies on rental data | Simple, easy to implement and understand |
| Fairness | High fairness in high-value areas | Fairer in rental-focused areas | Less fair in rapidly developing areas |
| City | Tax Assessment Method | Calculation Basis | Tax Payable | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mumbai | Capital Value System (CVS) | Based on the market value and capital value of the property | Higher due to market-linked value | CVS relies on the Ready Reckoner rate, which ties closely to current property market rates, causing higher fluctuations and often higher taxes. |
| Chennai | Rental Value System (RVS) | Based on the expected rental income of the property | Moderate; stable due to rental basis | RVS considers expected rent, providing some predictability, though taxes may rise based on rental demand fluctuations. |
| Bengaluru | Unit Area Value System (UAS) | Based on fixed unit rates per sq ft for each zone | Relatively lower and predictable | UAS offers a consistent tax rate with lower volatility as it does not directly follow market value. Calculated based on location and property type. |